Wednesday, March 6, 2013

We Moved!


Hey wonderful blogger people.  Just wanted to let you know that the Banned Library has up and moved to a new exciting platform.  Not to say blogger is bad, heck no!  But this new one is just awesome!

This blog will no longer be up dated as we are busy churning out library stuff over at the new Banned Library website!  So come on over to bannedlibrary.com and play with us!

Oh, and there might be a slight certificate issue, so if it's all "this page is bad" we are not, we swear.  Well, we are bad in some peoples eyes because we swear, but we swear we try not to do bad by you.  Except when we swear.  I dunno.

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Movie Review: Lord of the Rings Trilogy

Lord of the Rings Trilogy
Directed by Peter Jackson
Starring Just About Everybody

I have no idea how many people that read this also follow me on Twitter (@bannedlibrary, catch banned fever.) If you do, you may be aware that on the 27th Day of January, year of Superman 2013 I did a day-long live tweet commentary of all three Lord of the Rings films, the extended editions.  Starting at approximately 8:00 AM and ending nearly 15hours later (I took a break for lunch and paused while doing chores and such), I finally went to bed around midnight.  If you want to find that chain of what I think are honest insights and humorous asides, I suggest you check that out for supplemental material.  Also, it may have my favorite thing I have ever tweeted (toot a horn here), when I said “Frodo: "I wish I hadn't found the Bling." Hobo Magneto: "Tough shit. Keep on truckin." #LOTR #FOTR”

Summary

For those of you who do not really “get” pop culture: A little dude has to take a bit of bling and chunk it into some lava.  He starts off with a bunch of people, but they become assholes and go start a war.  Everything ends up pretty okay after that.

What I liked


  • The production
Look here.  This is a gorgeous set of movies that a lot of people took a lot of time to make sure looked freaking amazing.  The mix of practical and CGI is nearly perfect as giant monsters battle wizards and eagles swoop in and things go boom and stomp and crash.  The battle scenes alone are simply awesome in their scope.

  • The acting
Three get full mention.  Frodo, Sam, and Gollum carry not only a ring but about half of this movie.  While they do have moments that stretch on forever, when their part of the story gets a boost and something happens besides walking, it is awesome.  Especially when Sam cries or Gollum talks to himself.
The two other hobbits.  The first two movies they are basic comic relief but show true growth and gravitas.  The actors are obviously good at what they do, but I feel this is more the writers and editors finding those moments of truth that made me ultimately root for them over everyone else.

  • The moments of brilliance.
Can I stress that I watched these movies (about 11 hours worth) in one day?  I don’t have that kind of time to waste.  I have to write reviews and stuff and do library doings.  So why did I do it?  The moments.  Gandalf Vs the Balrog.  Sam Vs Shelob.  Smeagol Vs Gollum.  I am not sure how many of you have read the books, but they can be dry with moments of divine awesomeness.  The big battles and victories and defeats are what make this story.  As are the quiet moments when characters talk about giving up, losing hope, and letting things destroy them.  Sam crying.  Frodo and Gandalf talking.  Aragon not wanting his fate.  These could be the best movies in the world with the best actors, but the source material was mined for gold and gave a near perfect representation.  

What I didn’t like


  • Long
I’m not gonna lie; there’s not much I do not like about this series.  But one thing I can say is that this sumbitch is llllooooonnnngggg.  It meanders at times as characters walk around and give lovely speeches that are either contradicted, dismissed or just given a big ole ‘whatever’ to as they go along.  And then the 15 or so endings that wrap up all the stories.  I can not say what I would have done different because, well, this is not my story, but I do know that if one more person had sang we could have had another soundtrack from the last thirty minutes alone.

Who would like this

Nerds.  Fantasy fans.  Film fans.  Fans of long, long epic stories.  People who like horses.  Jewelry nuts.  Numenoreans.

Why was it banned?

The reasons for banning the books are outlined here.  Mostly for violence, magic, witchcraft, death, smoking, you know.  All the cool stuff that Christians do not like.

Join me on Goodreads

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Book Review: Storm Front by Jim Butcher

I laid out pretty clearly in my Cold Days review that the Dresden Files will always have a place in my heart. That’s why I am going back and reading the previous thirteen books in the series and giving them all a second look. Some may say I am too kind to this series and, well, that may be true. Just a heads up.

Also, this series has been out going on nearly fifteen years, so from here on out I am putting a blanket spoilers tag on everything Dresden Files. I will attempt to rein myself in from time to time, but in general I am going to assume you have at least a passing knowledge of this series if you are reading this. You have been warned.

Summary

Professional wizard private eye Harry Dresden investigates the murder of two people killed by black magic that rips hearts from chests as well as keeping ahead of mobsters and other magic users that want him dead. The reader is introduced to magic and Harry Dresden as a character. Other main players in Harry’s life are also introduced, including:
  • Karrin Murphy (police woman and Harry’s main employment as consultant)
  • Susan Rodriguez (reporter and Harry’s love interest) 
  • Johnny Marcone and enforcers (head of Chicago crime, all of it) 
  • Morgan (Harry’s warden charged with killing Harry if it is deemed Harry is using black magic) 
  • Bob the Skull (A spirit under Harry’s command and knowledge depositary)
  • Bianca (Head of the local Red Court Vampire clan)
  • Toot-Too (A fairy that “helps” Harry)
  • Mister (Harry’s large cat)

What I liked 

Noirish

As an urban fantasy novel, this book is heavy on the urban and relatively light on the fantasy. Few out of left field magical rules are displayed beyond what is needed to get the story told. The foremost aspect of this book is the detective nature of the main character. Like an old school noir protagonist, he is beaten and bruised by the end but still gets his man.

Magic rules

The magic on display is less about mystery and more about moving forces. Sure, the inherent quality of “magic” in and of itself is mysterious, but the world of this novel is set with hard line physics. Fire burns and keeps burning, magically created or no, until something stops it.

The world

An extension of the noir-ishness and the magic rules, the world of this novel is populated with interesting and complex characters with a backdrop of real life. Everyone has an agenda in this book, whether that is to amass power, find justice, or simply stay alive. Even the supernatural creatures, as alien as they can be, are fleshed out and made real through well placed dialog and actions. Combining all that is a snarky sense of humor and clever nods that runs through the book, as if Mr. Butcher is tempting you to enjoy your time reading no matter what.

What I didn’t like

The Villain

The villain in this book is given almost no page time, beyond a slight confrontation near the middle and the climax. The reader is given many clues as to how bad the person can be, but the result is underwhelming. This could be that the point of the story is Harry Dresden’s fight rather than the villain, but when the climax finally comes the bad guy is just another obstacle rather than an opponent.

The narrative

My main complaint about this book is how it drifts from scene to loosely connected scene. This is an opening book to a much larger planned series and it shows. From the character list above, one can see how many players are introduced that are important yet get small and inconsequential scenes. This causes the book to lose a decent flow at the expense of fleshing out an already rich world. While understandable within the context of a series, the introduction of a character that does not pay off in this book is jarring. An example of this is the vampire Bianca, whom Harry visits for information. While she becomes important later and the scene sets up an animosity between Harry and the vampires, she never appears again in this book. This could cause a first time reader to think the scene was clumsily added for shock, exposition and to boost page count by a first time writer rather than the needed exposition that it is. The book could have benefited from a tighter narrative that held to its own plot rather than including scenes that only play into the larger series plot.

Who would like this

Is there a genre called “hard” urban fantasy? Urban fantasy that sets up rules to its magic and keeps them tightly reined in? Readers of that type of fiction would enjoy this book. Other types of “high fantasy” fans might enjoy the series, but I feel they would not enjoy the crime and noir feeling the book trades for mysticism and grand hero places. When recommending this book, I tend to use the phrase “Harry Potter by way of Die Hard.” Sure, there is magic and a magical world filled with creatures, but the good guy is a rough and tumble sort with a bunch of problems and a quick wit that barely escapes with his life.

Why was it banned?

As far as I could find, it has not been. However, it is an adult book that features drugs, violence, magic, demons, sex, and gratuitous pizza eating.

Join me on Goodreads

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Django Unchained Review


Django Unchained


Written and Directed by Quentin Tarantino
Starring Jamie Foxx, Leonardo Dicaprio and Christoph Waltz

Special Message 

I am going to try not to spoil this movie because I think everyone should see it at least once. However, as I will mention below, this movie contains some extremely offensive subject matter, the least of which is the violence.

Summary

Django is a slave in the pre-Civil War South freed by bounty hunter Dr. King Schultz. The two of them then begin a campaign to free Django’s wife from the slaver Calvin Candie.

What I liked

Tarantino style

If you are like me and enjoy the irreverent take Quentin Tarantino brings to just about every subject matter he handles, then you will enjoy this movie. At its essence, this movie is spaghetti western heist flick where the robbers are cornered from the very start. Instead of an intricate plan to free themselves, out come the guns and everybody suffers. Add into that all the best actors fitting together in the best parts and this movie shines.

It’s funny

All of Tarantino’s movies contain at least a moment of quirky humor or dialog brought on by the ridiculousness of the situation. This movie goes for some of the most direct and pure humor I have seen that I think this is almost an homage to Blazing Saddles as much as it is Sergio Leone. The bag-eye hole scene alone will be remembered in comedy for years to come.

Straight forward.

Look, there’s an elephant in the room and I am going to name him. Racism in the south. Yeah, it exists as it does everywhere, but none more so in the time when we bought and sold people. There’s a word thrown around in this movie that is still thrown around in unpolite society to this day. And this movie is filled to the brim with it. It does not shy away. There is not PC guard on this movie at all. As Blazing Saddles did before it, I just holds up a mirror to the society that was and goes, “Yeah. This happened and it was like this. Fucked up, huh?” And it was and it is. Hell, the real life implications are told so well they almost come off as comical, making this come as close to a work of art as comedy can get.

What I didn’t like

Three. Damn. Hours.

Let’s get this out there: I cannot tell if directors are hearing the complaints of rising ticket prices and want to give people a bang for their buck or what, but I would love to see a movie that tells a gripping story in 90 minutes. Just once. Now that I have said that, this movie does clip along and you only really feel the runntime in the last hour or thirty minutes or so. I am not one to say, “Hey, save that scene for the sequel,” but much like the bloated novels that have come from authors, there’s a couple editors out there that should be given a little more power over their genius creators.

Who would like this

Tarantino fans. Film scholars looking to pad a class or two referencing modern movies taking on old spaghetti westerns. College students finding meaning in blades of grass or whatever. I dunno who this was made for outside of Tarantino himself, but I had fun.

Why was it banned?

There’s been some controversy in reviews over this movie about it’s blatant racist tone, but it has not been outright banned anywhere that I know of. I would not take the bet that there is a theater somewhere that refused to carry it, but none have done so to spark anything that I can find.