Kitchen Confidential Book Review

Summary
An autobiographical tale of one man's love obsession with food and the business of making food. Anthony Bourdain, famous chef of television and New York kitchens, gives an unflinching look into the business of food.

What I liked
Writing Style. Bourdain's story is told in a rambling, disjointed style that comes across more like a diary or book of short stories than a narrative memoir. This has positive and negative effects, the positive allowing the book to feel like a stranger telling you stories at the end of a heavy nights drinking at the bar.
Characters. The stories are filled with a cast of disjointed, eclectic individuals that make a prison yard look like a kindergarten. Punctuated with stories of success and excess, these people carry the stories as you learn their strengths in the kitchen and their weaknesses in life.
Honesty. The book is unflinching in the sex, drugs and rock and roll that Bourdain lived in. The candid nature of the text made me at times look back at my own time in kitchens and the reasons why I would go back and the reasons I ran screaming.

What I didn’t like
Sometimes distracting food porn. This book is as much about food as it is about Bourdain's life. This book has more food porn than the Hunger Games as the chef goes into detailed lists of various dishes in various languages. This can sometimes break the narrative or derail it entirely, sometimes distracting to the point that this reader had to stop and make a sandwhich or two to stop a growling stomach. This gives points to the effectiveness of his descriptions, but can stop the reading cold.
Broken biography. As I stated above, the writing style has negative moments. Like the food porn, jumping from story to story, life point to life point can be frustrating for the reader as it interupts the flow of the narrative. This might be just me, but when a writer gives candid and detailed descriptions in most of his text, the "boring" parts that are glossed over are just that more apparent.

Why was this book be banned?
I have no evidence of this book being banned from a school or library, but do not expect this book to be handed out at student job fairs. Graphic language including tales of sex, drug use and all around debauchery fill this book with a sometimes delightful glee.

Who would like this book?
Liberally minded foodies will also enjoy the obvious love of food in these pages. Adults who also indulge in books about rock stars cutting loose will enjoy the hell out of this book. I fear and hope that some teenagers out there get this book into their hands, as I believe as much as this book fills me with nostalgia it would prepare those who would venture into kitchens either as temporary employment or as a career.

Be my friend on GoodReads!

The Red Pyramid Book Review

The Red Pyramid (The Kane Chronicles, Book 1) by Rick Riordan

An extension of the Percy Jackson universe, gods, magic and heroes live among us in this tale of the Kane children, Carter and Sadie, as they learn they are the descendants of Ancient Egyptian magicians.

If you or your children liked the Harry Potter books, these may be the natural extension of that type of world and myth building. By bringing ancient myths into the present day, this tale of action and adventure teaches as well as entertains.

Now that all the boring stuff is out of the way, what did I think really?

What I liked

• Myths and legends of Ancient Egypt are really cool. Riordan’s interpretation of these figures in modern day settings makes for some fun and entertaining moments, such as the cat goddess grooming herself and other things that sound creepier than they are. Also, pointing out all the little Egyptian artifacts that are still in use today makes walking to the store all that more exciting.
• Riordan does not talk down to the audience. This book is kinda mean in the way the characters (preteen children) are knocked around, beaten down, and straight up told they are going to die more than once.
• Small nods. There are various small nods to both the Percy Jackson books as well as other mythologies, the biggest being Moses. I am excited to see if Riordain expands on this. (I really, really want him to write a Norse myth series.)
• F-Yeah moments. More than one time you will find yourself raising your fist as Carter and Sadie rise to an occasion, beat a bad guy silly, or just get off one good line.

What I did not like

• The characters are a little stale and oddly defined. As mixed race children, more than once it is mentioned that Carter is African American and Sadie looks more European American and was raised in London (complete with an British accent) but this rarely comes through in the story. This is an interesting choice, but part of me thinks it was wasted and the other part of me thinks it was done to give depth the kids did not need. I would have liked this choice better if it had been handled with more subtlety rather than the odd mention or use of British slang terms as this would have given each character a unique voice rather than the same voice with different terms.
• Alternating chapters. An extension of the last point, as each sibling hands off the story to the other, the effect is either jarring or simply “man, I was having fun with him/her.” The effect is used in other fiction (Game of Thrones) to give alternating perspectives on the same events or “what was also happening while...”, but here (with few exceptions) both children are present for every event and have the same perspective. Each of their voices is nearly the same, asking why this had to be written this way.
• Use of Egyptian Names. This could have bothered me more than in the Percy Jackson books because I am more familiar with Greek/Roman mythology, but each time I was given the name of this god or that, I forgot it. Notice how above I keep mentioning “cat god?” No idea what her name was and she was my favorite character. Saying this and also saying that it teaches me stuff (above)... well, I am old and do not really care. I do see this making children go running to Wikipedia, though. (God help us.)
• Setting. Hogwart’s. Camp Halfblood. Sound familiar? Because these are home base. They are a safe harbor and a known entity. Children’s books need this place, a comfortable setting, because they give the audience a place to return to where everything in the book can operate with the book’s world rules. I am fine with Indiana Jones running around the world, but Harry Potter better get his ass to Hogwart’s at some point. This book does not have that, or at least introduces then destroys at least two. It keeps the story loose and moving, but this also takes away something for the audience to connect to.

Why was it banned? Justified?
I could find no instance of the Red Pyramid being banned in a school or library, but that does not mean it could not happen. The abundancy of mentions about worshiping the gods (not Christian) and mention of Christian mythology may lead more religious parents to dislike this book, if not for the blatant mention of magic. Some parents may also not wish their children to be introduced to the idea of mixed race children (however poorly handled) until the child (and parent) is ready to tackle the idea of racism (or they could just be bigoted assholes. Yeah, I’ll judge you on that.) A wild number of murders and deaths also happen in the book, mostly offscreen, that may make some parents want to hold off until the kid is older.

Doctor Who: "The Angels Take Manhattan" Review

If you have not watched the latest episode of Doctor Who, "The Angels Take Manhattan," then just skip this review as I may spoil some things as I rant and rave.  Go.  Close this and go watch it if you care, then come back and give me another hit on the website.  Do that anyway, if you are feeling funky.  Hint, hint.

Also, I am going to rant and rave about the new Doctor Who in general because I do not think I have done that, at least in a while, so if you have not watched since the Christopher Eccleston days, probably spoilers there, too.  They are all on Netflix, go nuts.  Start with Blink, not because it pertains to this episode but because it's just really good television.

Okay, on to the ranting and raving.

Summary:
The Angels are back and in Manhattan.  After Rory gets sent back in time, Amy and the Doctor follow and with River Song attempt to put right what once... well, things happen.

What I liked:

• The atmosphere and overall noir-ish feel that it kinda sorta had.  Could have used more of this.  New York is given full treatment and I really wanted to visit it again after watching this episode.
• The cast.  I really like to see these people play.  Matt Smith, Karen Gillian, Arthur Darvill and Alex Kingston, regardless of how you feel about their characters, are really, really good at making everything seem fun and in the moment.  I never question why these people are together.
• The Angels.  I am probably the first person to say this on the internet, so here goes: The Angels scare the crap out of me and I really like the opportunities they give for the writers to play with time in story. Plus, baby Angels and the pitter patter of little feet.  Shudder.
• The good use of a goodbye.  Done twice, but the first time is more effective.

What I disliked:

• The last minute fix to the paradox.  This was a blatant rip-off of the Rose goodbye in Series Two, but with the Doctor having nothing to do with the final decision.  There is only tension and storytelling goodness when there is hope that the hero will save the day and he does not.  That is what makes a character send off good. Which is what they realized so the writers wrote...
• The twist.  Out of nowhere, with little to no foreshadowing and almost disrespectful to a character that for the last four years is the only one to see even the smallest amount of growth.
• The unexplained.  How are the Angels back after being erased?  How do they get around the galaxy?  What happened to that whole "look them in the eye thing?"  What happened to "they can not move even if they see themselves?"  And how does that one statue walk down the middle of Manhattan with no one noticing?  I think it would be pretty awkward if it just got stuck because a homeless dude could not sleep.  Blah, plot holes, plot holes, sticky sticky plot holes.
• River Song in general.  Do not get me wrong, I like the idea of the character and enjoy seeing her on screen working with the others, but she just seems to show up and know everything.  Which I guess is what the Doctor does, but now knowing her back story this seems improbable.

On the whole, a good episode that seemed to be a monster of the week.  Care did not seem to be taken to give the send off that we had been waiting for and I hope this becomes relevant in the future.  The tired themes that people age while the Doctor does not and that the Doctor needs a companion have been told better and way too many times.  Seems they could come up with more interesting themes and stories for a being that has traveled all of space and time for 1,200 years is all I'm saying.

About Moffet's 11th Doctor run in general:  I like it, but it does not have the cohesiveness of the Davies run that I came to expect.  The grand story lines, multi-part episodes that all build to a conclusion seem to have been dropped, which has lead to a lack of character development in general.  The stories do not serve the characters or give them depth.  Ask yourself: what do each of these characters need and what do they want and how are those at opposed at any given time?  The Doctor needs companions and wants adventure, so he gets it.  Rory needs a backbone and wants Amy, so he gets it.  Amy needs a life and wants adventure, so she gets it.  Who the hell knows about River...  This is boring and more in tune with a monster-of-the-week type show than the grand spectacles we have seen in previous series where the characters grow from week to week.  Martha went from doctor to field agent.  Donna, one of the greatest companions, went from secretary to the most important person in the universe "Doctor/Donna," changed profoundly from what she was in a single season.  Even Rose, arguably the weakest of the companions, had her eyes opened from an innocent shop girl with a family to a kinda badass that hopped dimensions.  And all of these had great send-offs that made us want to see what happened next in their lives.

This is odd coming from Moffet, who gave us some of the more memorable multi-part episodes of the Davies run.  The threads they do use, apart from the Centurion/Pandorica, fall flat, are predicatable and have poor endings.  I do not feel triumphant when the 11th Doctor wins, and that is a sad thing to have happen to a great character.  

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone: Book Review

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (Book 1)
by J.K. Rowling
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

“Yer a wizard, Harry.” Full stop, there you go, that sums up this, the first year at Hogwart’s School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. I want to be fair here and say this is my second time reading the first of Harry Potter’s adventures and am as biased as the rest of fandom about this series, while maybe not so rabid.

J.K. Rowling is not so much a great writer as she is a world builder. A minor deity weaving a magical land that not only do you want to believe is real, you genuinely hope that it is real. The small and grand touches of magic that she spices the stories with help to immerse the reader with the best effect made in the first installment of the series. The slow introduction of both Harry and the reader to the world of magic is well told, each chapter building on the rest. If it were my choice, Rowling would continually set stories in this world that she has created and shun all others that may be brewing in her mind.

Other stories in this world would and could be fascinating from different points of view, as Rowling shows in the series by giving excellent side characters to play around the main character. These side characters, such as Nearly Headless Nick or the nurse Madam Pomfrey, often caused the main characters and the reader to talk about them in whispers lest they hear. As for the main cast, in this first book I can give them a pass as blank slates that build desires and wants as they move through the story and let them live as the child reader avatars that they are.

The writing of this story has some hits and misses. After it was pointed out to me the number of times Rowling likes to use adverbs when her characters speak, I could not help but notice them everywhere (he types pointedly). Overall, though, the descriptions are clean, the dialog is fun, and the writing level exceeds those meant for this age group.

This book has been banned on numerous occasions for its liberal use of magic and sorcery by children. The concern is that children will read the book and attempt to find a train station that does not exist that will take them to a school they cannot go to with supplies they cannot buy and learn witchcraft from people that are different from them. There may also be some complaints out there from those that can get past the magic thing that the books encourages challenging authority in children as well as wandering in the woods hoping to meet a unicorn or centaur.

Friend Me on Goodreads

Ready Player One Review

Ready Player One by Ernest Cline

Wade Watts lives in a not too distant future where just about everyone lives in a craptastic hellhole of depression with only one bright spot: the online MMO world OASIS. Five years after the creator of the game died, everyone on the planet is still looking for the easter eggs planted inside OASIS that will lead to a ton of money. When Wade becomes the first to find the first key, the hunt is on in a virtual world steeped in everything 80’s pop culture has to offer.

This book came around with little fanfare in my library and I find that a crime. Few people talked about it or promoted it despite the fact that it was on the New York Times Bestsellers List for weeks. At the time, I guess my nerd radar was off because I never picked it up until now. So when Ernest Cline, the screenwriter of the funny yet flawed Fanboys, showed up a couple of weeks ago for his second appearance of the NSFW Show podcast, I instantly put this on my to-read list. Add to the fact the contest that is going on based on the book to win a DeLorean and my nerd antenna was tuned in.

The only developed characters in the book are Wade Watts and his fellow “gunters” (egg hunters) Aech and Art3mis. Wade is our narrator, set up to be a brilliant and resourceful kid despite his poverty and social awkwardness. We follow him as he becomes more powerful and famous throughout OASIS and how this changes his relationships and his mental attitude. He is a fun character, but his hero journey has little in way of growth. Wade is a good guy and despite a few moments of grief or pain he pretty much stays a good guy.

Aech, Wade’s best friend, and Art3mis, Wade’s love interest, also get little in the way of growth as characters. The only growth they are given are in the way of information discovery as Wade finds out more about their real lives behind their OASIS avatars. I can blame most of the lack of character conflict in this novel on the avatar structure which sets up pretty good social commentary on how people hide behind anonymity online but little else. Also, some parts of the novel are rushed with almost montage-like scenes (which may fit the 80s themes) where we are told “the characters really like each other because of x, y, and z activities and likes they share.” Not a bad thing to do in an a book heavy on its action and adventure aspects, but I would have liked some quiet character moments.

Final Opinion
I burned through this book in one night and two lunch hours. As a treasure hunt type of novel, when the action revs up, you find yourself turning the pages faster and faster to see what happens next, then going back to see what pop culture references you missed. And that is what makes half this book fun, the references. If you were a child of the 80s that had movies, TV and video games as your primary child rearing devices, this book should hit every chord in your brain bringing back memories on nearly every page. If you don’t know a lot about that kind of stuff... well, the story is enjoyable, just get ready to skip a lot of sections describing in detail various video game scenarios and tricks. A solid book that leans heavily on nostalgia, but still makes you wonder what is going to happen next.

Why Was It Banned?
As far as I can tell, this book has not been banned or challenged in the year it has been published. However, like the video games it references, expect to see this one crop up from time to time with allegations of crude language or adult themes. And it does, just like the movies in the 80s did that showed kids screaming and kicking Wolfman in the nards (10 points if you get that). You may be tempted to slip this into that really cool 11-year-old’s hands like my cousin did with his used copies of Stephen King, but be warned that this book about people playing a video game contains murder, violence, language, and references to Zork that may frustrate even the coolest of modern kids and terrify the adults in charge of them.

Kitchen Confidential 1

I worked in kitchens while in college.  Did I become a master chef?  Hell no.  I can barely make pancakes.  But I can.  And I do.  Did this morning, as a matter of fact. Why am I telling you this?  I digressed.  I meant to explain that I completely understand both the intention, spirit, and language of this book, despite having an underdeveloped palate.  In my experience with kitchens, I tended to like the work and the people more than the actual food which is why I walked away from it.

How can I say I liked the work but not the food?  Easy.  Have you ever been driving around your hometown and become lost in thought and suddenly realized you are already at home?  That's what working in a kitchen was like for me.  A series of rather simple tasks that you repeat over and over that after a while become second nature.  That one day when you are standing over the grill and your hands begin to reach for things without you having to remember where they are, where you feel the heat and the burn but it does not bother you, that is a great day.  When you can drop a spatula and then lean down to get it "off the bottom shelf" without breaking stride preparing whatever mix of things you had on the grill and then there is this thing you prepared that will feed another human being.  Think about that.  Most of the food you eat that keeps you alive is being prepared by people so used to cooking that thing they did not have to think about it.  There is something very freeing for me about that certainty, that power.

But I hated smelling like a kitchen after each shift, especially the bleach we used to clean everything with, so I left and went into libraries.  Same amount of people drama, but less knives.  I miss the kitchen sometimes.  Nothing like it.

So, yes, I am enjoying this book.  His obvious love for everything food is on the surface awesome and I admire that passion as well as the rawness of the kitchen "life style."  Plus, I have had too many drunken memories of nights hanging out with cooks and waitresses to not also feel a little nostalgic when reading this.

The Giver Review

The Giver is one of those books that comes along and just slaps your little childhood in the head. As a young boy, the title sounded so innocuous. “The Giver.” Blah. Give me “The Space Ninja Who Kills Fools With a Laser Sword,” my younger self thought. Then, plowing through the pages in record time, I had my world blown open almost as much as the protagonist, Jonas, does. Now, some twenty years later, I am returning to this book and seeing what all the fuss young me made was all about.

Beware, thar be spoilers.

In the too distant future, Jonas lives in a collective with his family where his life is strictly managed. Everyone in the community over twelve has a job, a function, and on his next birthday Jonas will get his. But when his job turns out to be the Receiver of Memories, a once in a generation position, Jonas is about to learn what his place in the world really is. Cue dramatic lightning, cause they control the weather in this book but not enough for me to have just mentioned it except for the sake of a bad joke. Cracka-boom.

Our main character Jonas is an inquisitive, happy young boy. He stars the book innocent, almost bland except our omniscient narrator gives him thoughts that even without hearing the thoughts of others seem different. He is color in a book of black and white and that sentence means something to anyone who has seen the movie Pleasantville. His family, while playing the roles of caring mother, silly dad and bratty sister, are just as empty of life as the schedules the community keeps. With exception to the compassion they give the baby, Gabriel, the family seems to only respond to each other in accordance to the rules, not by any familial obligation. This is apparent to savvy readers right away while a younger audience will take this in as Jonas does in the book.

The only other stand out character is The Giver, Jonas’s mentor and the one who opens the boy’s eyes with knowledge of good and evil and compassion as that knowledge overtakes Jonas. This man is like a walking, talking tree from the garden of eden, which is an apt description and a nice reverse metaphor for the direction the book takes. As Jonas gets more information, he feels more apart, more naked from society. This culminates when he learns the community’s term “release” means “euthanize” (“killin folk” for those of you without a dictionary or vocabulary) and that this applies to everyone who has been “released,” including the old and noisy babies.

Two things, then I’ll wrap up.

The title. The title is interesting because there are actually two Givers in the book, the old man who gives to Jonas and Jonas who gives to Gabriel. One has to wonder who this story is about then, the small boy coming of age, waking up to the hell that all he knows and loves is gone, or the old man who is watching all this happen. He is the only other person that knows what Jonas is going through, yet Jonas is the only internal voice we hear. Something to think on.

The ending. I have heard the ending has been hotly debated as to what is happening. Me? I think both those kids are dead. Here’s where I am going to sound cold and detached, but I’m analyzing a story not cutting up a frog so give me some slack. Anyway, the ending scene is Jonas carrying Gabriel up a snow covered hill where he finds a sled and they slide down, just like the first memory The Giver gave to Jonas. Too big of a coinky-dink for me to overlook. The larger implications are also kinda staggering. Did The Giver mean for Jonas to die all along? I say yes. The old man was not naive enough to believe that the Elsewhere was a real place that could be escaped to except through release, death, whatever. Neither could he have expected Jonah, basically a privileged city boy, to survive in the wilds by himself. Also, the goal of this escape is to release the memories into the populous so the people can feel again. The only other time this happened, the Receiver gave up the memories when she died, implying that memories are either given person to person or in death they are given en masse. The old man played Jonas, especially in showing him release, into going out into the wilderness where he had no chance of survival. The ending scene, of Jonas and Gabriel sliding down a hill from one happy memory to another, is a death scene as Jonas’s body has already described textbook symptoms of hypothermia.

Of course, part of me wants to believe the old man did all this to take over the community and this is some sort of Wizard of Oz prequel. He outright states to Jonas he has to stay back to comfort the distraught people. What if he talked his first receiver into suicide as a test run and Jonas is the atom bomb to give the most memories out at once? Then he stays behind and is all “Don’t worry, wussies, I been through this, no biggie, just let me teach you how to deal.” Just because you love something does not mean you will not give it away for greater gain. Villains have been doing it throughout literature and history forever. That’s pretty freaking dark.

Why was it banned?
There are several reasons as to why this work has been banned. For one, it kills a baby and implies the systematic extermination of anyone who steps out of line. That’s, as I said before, pretty freaking dark. Also, there are fairly graphic depictions of war and death in various other forms in the memories Jonas receives, not to mention the deep sadness that Jonas feels towards them.

For another, the book can establish mistrust and rebellious attitudes toward authority figures. Let’s face it, this book does not treat the government in a good light and paints parents as subjective pack animals. Some parents may object to their children reading this book and suddenly viewing their jobs and place in society as worthless, not to mention religious and other overlording collectives in society.

Finally, this book could be seen to some distraught children as a go ahead for suicide. The actions of various characters that learn the truth could be internalized by a mind that is filled with grief and delusion. The book outright states that those that cannot fit in are either taken out or take themselves out and gives little counterargument. The overall theme is hope in humanity, in love, but it gives little reward for these ideals. Even the happy ending is a bit of a fridge horror scenario when one thinks about it too much, as I demonstrated above.

Final thoughts
It’s good. Sometimes the writing is a little dull and the lessons are kicked into your head, but this is an effective dystopian narrative that ends up asking more questions than it raises. What do you do when your world falls apart? Is this what growing up feels like? What is the nature of man? All valid and worth asking.